Wednesday, November 1, 2023
HomeTechnologySam Bankman-Fried Denies Understanding FTX Cash Was Lacking, as He Concludes Testimony

Sam Bankman-Fried Denies Understanding FTX Cash Was Lacking, as He Concludes Testimony


Again and again on Tuesday, Sam Bankman-Fried, the founding father of the failed FTX cryptocurrency change, denied realizing that billions of {dollars} in buyer cash had been misappropriated till shortly earlier than his firm collapsed final 12 months, as a federal prosecutor grilled him for a second day in his legal fraud trial.

The 31-year-old onetime crypto mogul fumbled for a solution when the prosecutor, Danielle Sassoon, repeatedly requested whether or not he had advised his workers to not spend FTX buyer cash on investments, dear actual property and different expenditures. Mr. Bankman-Fried additionally couldn’t identify any workers who might need approved the usage of FTX buyer cash for that spending.

“I don’t recall giving any route,” Mr. Bankman-Fried stated thrice in regards to the spending of FTX buyer cash earlier than he concluded his testimony. Either side rested their case earlier than lunchtime on Tuesday, with closing statements set to unfold on Wednesday.

Mr. Bankman-Fried was on the stand for a 3rd day testifying earlier than a jury in his personal protection for a trial that has come to represent the highs and lows of the unstable crypto trade. The entrepreneur has been accused of masterminding a yearslong fraud to steal as a lot as $10 billion from FTX’s clients after which funneling the cash to extravagant real-estate purchases and different spending, in addition to utilizing the funds to prop up a crypto buying and selling agency he additionally based, Alameda Analysis.

FTX, which was valued at $32 billion at its peak, imploded spectacularly final 12 months, leaving many purchasers unable to get well their deposits. Mr. Bankman-Fried has pleaded not responsible to seven counts of fraud, conspiracy and cash laundering. If convicted, he might face what quantities to a life sentence.

The primary few weeks of his trial have been stuffed by a procession of prosecution witnesses who’ve pointed the finger squarely at Mr. Bankman-Fried and stated he directed them to commit crimes. Three of his closest associates — Caroline Ellison, Nishad Singh and Gary Wang — have pleaded responsible and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors.

The pileup of damaging testimony might have pressured the FTX founder’s hand in testifying, a dangerous transfer for a legal defendant. Taking the stand gave Mr. Bankman-Fried a chance to say that he by no means meant to defraud anybody and that his enterprise selections have been made in good religion. Nevertheless it has additionally allowed prosecutors to zero in on his previous public statements and distinction them with what he did in non-public.

When Mr. Bankman-Fried initially took the stand on Friday, he took questions from his personal lawyer, Mark Cohen. Mr. Bankman-Fried denied that he had dedicated fraud or stolen from FTX’s clients, but additionally acknowledged that he had made errors, citing “vital oversights” that harm the change’s clients.

On Monday below cross-examination, Ms. Sassoon, the prosecutor, pressed Mr. Bankman-Fried in regards to the inconsistencies between his public statements and the way he ran his crypto empire. He usually insisted that he couldn’t keep in mind a lot of what he had stated publicly.

On Tuesday, the cross-examination continued, specializing in the actions and statements Mr. Bankman-Fried made main as much as the implosion of FTX in November. Mr. Bankman-Fried, carrying the identical grey go well with and purple tie as in earlier days on the stand, testified in entrance of a crowded courtroom that included Damian Williams, the highest federal prosecutor in New York. Lacking from the gallery was Mr. Bankman-Fried’s mom, the Stanford legislation professor Barbara Fried, who had attended each earlier day of the trial.

Ms. Sassoon, the federal prosecutor, was relentless, asking Mr. Bankman-Fried in regards to the failure of FTX, together with if a number of the cooperating witnesses had not advised the reality about Alameda, the buying and selling agency, owing billions in buyer cash to the change. Mr. Bankman-Fried beforehand testified that he didn’t study in regards to the lacking funds till about October 2022, whereas different witnesses testified that he knew a lot earlier.

At one level, Ms. Sassoon requested Mr. Bankman-Fried if Adam Yedidia, a former FTX developer who testified on the trial, was mendacity when he stated in court docket that Mr. Bankman-Fried had advised him in the summertime of 2022 that Alameda owed $8 billion to FTX clients.

“I don’t keep in mind him saying it in that means,” Mr. Bankman-Fried replied.

Ms. Sassoon then requested if Ms. Ellison, who ran Alameda and was at one level Mr. Bankman-Fried’s girlfriend, was flawed when she testified that she and Mr. Bankman Fried had conspired with others to misappropriate FTX buyer cash.

“You didn’t inform your workers ‘Don’t spend FTX buyer deposits?’” Ms. Sassoon requested at one level.

“I didn’t,” Mr. Bankman-Fried stated. “I deeply remorse not taking a greater look into it.”

Ms. Sassoon additionally requested Mr. Bankman-Fried if he remembered providing favors to authorities officers within the Bahamas, the place FTX was headquartered. He stated he didn’t recall giving the Bahamian prime minister, Philip Davis, and his spouse courtside tickets to the FTX Enviornment in Miami. The jury was then proven screenshots of messages of him saying precisely that. (The world has been renamed.)

The prosecution additionally displayed emails during which Mr. Bankman-Fried provided to open withdrawals for Bahamian clients after FTX had halted buyer withdrawals as folks tried to get their cash out from the change final 12 months. FTX was below investigation by Bahamian regulators on the time.

Throughout a short redirect, Mr. Bankman-Fried tried to make clear that he didn’t know who at Alameda had approved the spending of FTX buyer cash. FTX had about two dozen workers, he stated, and “I wasn’t notably occupied with making an attempt to dole out blame.”

After closing statements on Wednesday, jurors might begin deliberating a verdict for the case as quickly as Thursday.

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments